PROP FIRM ODDS ← Back to the calculator

FundingPips vs The5%ers: which challenge is cheaper to get funded?

Both firms' $100K challenges, with rules checked on their own sites, put through the same 20,000 simulated attempts.

Independent. Rules checked on each firm's own site. Ranking is never paid for.

For a trader with 45% win rate, 1:2 R:R, 1% risk per trade, 2 trades a day on a $100K account, The5%ers is the cheaper route to funded: High Stakes New costs $446 on average, failed attempts included, against $536 for FundingPips' 1-Step Flex · 2% daily, about $90 less. Change the trader and the answer can flip, which is why the calculator exists.

Head to head

best plan of each · $100K
FundingPipsThe5%ers
Cheapest route to funded1-Step Flex · 2% dailyHigh Stakes New
Fee$529$405
Pass chance99%91%
Trading days (median pass)1419
Avg. to funded$536$446
Target12%10% → 5%
Daily loss2%4%
Max loss12% static8% static
Min. daysnone3 profitable days per phase
Trustpilot4.54.7

Reference trader: 45% win rate, 1:2 R:R, 1% risk per trade, 2 trades a day, no extra trading costs, 20,000 simulated attempts per plan, $100K accounts unless shown otherwise. Avg. to funded is the fee divided by the pass chance: what you spend on average, failed attempts included, before you hold a funded account. How the simulation works.

By challenge type

TypeFundingPipsThe5%ersCheaper
2-step2-Step Pro$566 · 82% passHigh Stakes New$446 · 91% passThe5%ers

Pass chance by risk per trade

the two cheapest routes
Plan0.5% risk1% risk2% risk
1-Step Flex · 2% dailyFundingPips99%+99%15%
High Stakes NewThe5%ers99%91%67%

The reference trader is not you. Run both firms against your own win rate, R:R and risk. The calculator ranks every plan for your numbers.

Run your own numbers

Every FundingPips and The5%ers plan at $100K

PlanTargetDailyMax lossFeePass chanceAvg. to funded
High Stakes NewThe5%ers · 2-step10% → 5%4%8% static$40591%$446
High Stakes ClassicThe5%ers · 2-step8% → 5%4%8% static$45591%$501
1-Step Flex · 2% dailyFundingPips · 1-step12%2%12% static$52999%$536
2-Step ProFundingPips · 2-step6% → 6%3%6% static$46682%$566
2-Step Standard · 3% dailyFundingPips · 2-step8% → 5%3%10% static$54496%$569
2-Step FlexFundingPips · 2-step10% → 8%4%12% static$55598%$569
1-Step Flex · 3% dailyFundingPips · 1-step12%3%12% static$66699%$674
2-Step Standard · 5% dailyFundingPips · 2-step8% → 5%5%10% static$65296%$682

Questions

Is FundingPips or The5%ers cheaper?

The lowest $100K fee is $466 at FundingPips and $405 at The5%ers. Counting failed attempts, The5%ers is cheaper to get funded for a trader with 45% win rate, 1:2 R:R, 1% risk per trade, 2 trades a day: $446 against $536.

Which is easier to pass, FundingPips or The5%ers?

For the same trader, the highest pass chance at FundingPips is 1-Step Flex · 2% daily (99%) and at The5%ers High Stakes New (91%). A higher pass chance often costs a higher fee, so check the cost to get funded too.

Which has more drawdown room, FundingPips or The5%ers?

The roomiest $100K plan at FundingPips is 2-Step Flex (12% static, daily 4%); at The5%ers it is High Stakes New (8% static, daily 4%). A static maximum loss gives more room than a trailing one of the same size.

Is FundingPips or The5%ers rated better on Trustpilot?

FundingPips scores 4.5 and The5%ers 4.7 on Trustpilot (checked 4 November 2026).